Howard Dean
  Home Page Election 2004 | Howard Dean | John Kerry | On the Issues with Howard Dean | On the Issues with John Kerry | Comments on Howard Dean | Comments on John Kerry | Comments on President Bush | George W. Bush on the Issues | Joseph Lieberman and Dick Gephardt on the Issues | Comments on the 2004 Election | Links to Other 2004 Election News  


Howard Dean is Being Highly Talked About in the Media
Aug.3,2003
From Howard Dean's Official blog:
Howard Dean makes the covers of this week's Time and Newsweek, as well as the cover (in the upper left) of U.S. News & World Report. This is absolutely incredible news. Never before, this early in a primary race-- before a single vote has been cast-- has a candidate made the cover of all three major newsweeklies. On top of the Texas ad and tomorrow night's appearance on Larry King, millions of Americans will be talking about Howard Dean this week and learning about him for the first time. Join them in this great American conversation. Tell your friends and colleagues why you support Howard Dean.


Dean leads Democrats, but many undecided
By JONATHAN ROOS
Register Staff Writer
08/03/2003
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean narrowly leads U.S. Rep. Dick Gephardt as the Democratic presidential frontrunner in a new Des Moines Register poll of Iowans likely to participate in the Democratic caucuses.
The Iowa Poll shows Dean, who has emerged nationally as a major contender for the Democratic nomination, is the first choice of 23 percent of those who say they definitely or probably will attend the January precinct caucuses, which kick off the nominating season for the nation.
"I like his stand on the war in Iraq," said poll respondent Wendy Parker, 39, an assistant principal from Newton. "He's thoughtful and willing to take risks, willing to speak out for what he thinks is right."
Gephardt, a Missouri congressman who won the Iowa caucuses in 1988 but went on to lose the Democratic nomination to Michael Dukakis, is favored by 21 percent in the poll. Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry was third with 14 percent.
Although the race for the Democratic nomination is a long way from the finish line, Dean's vote-getting power in Iowa and his strong poll numbers in other key states show he has created momentum during the summer. He has helped himself in Iowa by spending more time campaigning in the state than any other candidate so far.
Candidates generally aim to finish third or better in Iowa to strengthen their bids in New Hampshire and other states with early primaries. The bar is set high for Gephardt because of his 1988 victory and familiarity to Iowans.
Gephardt is Parker's second choice.
"He's got experience and has certainly gone down this road before," she said. "I don't think that he's a risk-taker. He's probably more willing to say what people want to hear."
The only other candidate in double digits in the nine-member field is Joe Lieberman. The Connecticut senator and running mate of Al Gore in 2000 garners the support of 10 percent of likely caucus participants.
Those further back in the pack are U.S. Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina at 5 percent and U.S. Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Ohio at 4 percent. The poll shows Edwards has failed to get much traction in Iowa so far despite making a concerted campaign effort. He built up good will with the Iowa Democratic Party last year by visiting four times and by contributing significant resources to the party's 2002 election efforts.
Bringing up the rear at 1 percent each are U.S. Sen Bob Graham of Florida, former U.S. Sen. Carol Moseley Braun of Illinois and the Rev. Al Sharpton of New York.
The Iowa Poll, taken July 22-29, has a margin of error of 4.9 percentage points.
Recent polls in New Hampshire showed Dean and Kerry running neck and neck. A Field Poll of Californians taken last month showed Dean with a slight lead over Kerry and Lieberman.
Dean's rivals can take heart from the fact that no candidate in Iowa has a decisive lead, which is reflected in national polls as well, and there is still plenty of time for people to change their minds.
Many Democrats are still undecided. The Iowa Poll shows one-fifth of likely caucus participants are either uncommitted or unsure about which candidate to support.
Even so, other poll findings suggest that Dean's lead over Gephardt and the other Democratic contenders has a firm foundation:
* Dean's support is fairly broad-based. Among likely caucus participants he is the first choice of 36 percent of those with incomes topping ,000, 28 percent of those with college degrees, 28 percent of those between the ages of 45 and 64, 28 percent of those from small cities, and 28 percent of men.
* In competing with Gephardt and others for the support of the labor vote, a key Democratic constituency, Dean is the first choice of 29 percent of likely caucus participants from households with a union member. Gephardt, who received pivotal support from labor groups in 1988, is supported by 24 percent from union households. Kerry's share is 11 percent.
* Dean is generally well regarded. Among those who are familiar enough with him to have an opinion, 38 percent rate their feelings toward him as very favorable. That compares with 33 percent who view Kerry very favorably, 29 percent for Gephardt and 14 percent for Lieberman.
* Among Iowans polled who say they definitely will attend the Democratic caucuses, which is a firmer commitment than those saying they probably will attend, Dean's lead grows to 10 points over Gephardt.
"This isn't as much of a niche candidacy as some people have wanted to portray it," said J. Ann Selzer, the Register's pollster.
While Dean has mounted a serious challenge to Gephardt in Iowa, Gephardt clearly remains in the thick of the fight. He showed during his Iowa campaign in 1988 that he could bounce back from sagging poll numbers and rally his troops to victory.
Gephardt, a former House Democratic leader, is the best-known candidate in the field. Nearly three-fourths of all likely caucus participants have very or mostly favorable feelings toward him.
Gephardt's pockets of strength include the 28 percent of senior citizens - those 65 or older - who make him their first choice for the presidency. He also is the top choice of 31 percent of those with a high school education or less, 30 percent of Protestants, 27 percent of rural residents and 23 percent of women.
His supporters include poll respondent Bill Weydert, 49, of Peosta, who works at a plant that makes electric motors.
"I think he's a little more middle of the road," Weydert said. "He has lots of experience in Congress. . . . He understands the Midwest and farming. I'm also a farmer."
Kerry, the U.S. senator from Massachusetts, is the first choice of 21 percent of Catholics among likely caucus participants, 19 percent of those with college degrees, and 19 percent of those with incomes between ,000 and ,000.
Mario Iniguez, a 21-year-old Grandview resident who will be a senior at Iowa State University this fall, said he's attracted to Kerry because Kerry is a charismatic figure who has his priorities straight.
"He seems to have a very good way with people. He's very social," said Iniguez. "He doesn't seem to be so gung-ho on the war. He seems to be compassionate about the economy. He understands that terrorism is a real threat but there are also problems here at home."
Kerry can take some comfort from the poll's finding that he is likely caucus participants' most popular second choice to become president, favored by 18 percent. Dean and Gephardt each are the second choice of 14 percent. Lieberman is the second choice of 10 percent.
Kerry's second-choice endorsements are tempered by the fact, however, that many of them come from Iowans backing other top-tier Democratic candidates, rather than from supporters of weaker candidates who could drop out of the race.
The Democratic contender who stands out as the least-liked candidate in the poll is Sharpton. Thirty-seven percent of likely caucus participants give him that dubious distinction. Next on the least-liked list is Lieberman at 9 percent.
Likely caucus participants are generally upbeat about Democrats' chances of winning back the White House. Fifty percent say any Democratic candidate, regardless of who it is, has at least a 50-50 chance to defeat President Bush. Another 34 percent are even more confident, saying the Democratic nominee has a very good chance of knocking off the Republican incumbent.
The war in Iraq and its aftermath have emerged as a volatile campaign issue that has energized many Democratic activists. It also has created uncertainty.
The Iowa Poll shows 39 percent of likely caucus participants believe the only Democratic candidate who can defeat Bush is one who opposed the war from the beginning. But another 29 percent say it will take a candidate who supported the war to win the presidency next year. The remaining 32 percent are unsure.
The poll also shows 61 percent of likely caucus participants were mostly or strongly opposed to the war from the beginning, and anti-war sentiment among this group has grown even more in recent weeks.
Even among the 38 percent who initially favored the war to at least some degree, more than half now say they look with less favor on the conflict.



Howard Dean "The President Has Misled Us"
Friday, July 25, 2003
Howard Dean made the following statement today while campaigning in Iowa:
"When George W. Bush ran for president three years ago, he promised us an era of responsibility in Washington--instead we've got an era of irresponsibility unparalleled in our history. A week after discovering that the cost of occupying Iraq will be double the original estimates, we found out that the nation's deficit is 50 percent higher than estimated just five months ago. In fact, during his two-and-a-half years in office, the President has misled us, the American people, on nearly every policy initiative his administration has put forth.
"Trust and credibility are at the very heart of the relationship between a government and its people. And that trust demands that leaders level with the people about what they are doing, the reason they are doing it and the consequences of their actions. The very soul of democracy is at risk when leaders are not straight and truthful with the people.
"By now, we all know that President Bush misled the American people on the rationale for war with Iraq. We now know that the Niger uranium claim was discredited, that evidence regarding aluminum tubes was highly questionable, and that the link to al Qaeda was virtually non-existent.
"Last week I asked sixteen questions about the war in Iraq that must be answered if the American people are to understand the truth around the rush to war and the failure to plan for peace.
"These questions are, however, only one piece of a far broader practice by this administration of misleading the American people and breaching the fundamental trust that they have placed in their elected leadership. This practice goes far beyond misleading the country and the world about the reasons for taking us to war in Iraq, this practice extends into the state of the nation's economy, its environment, its schools and beyond.
"Mr. President, today I call on you to level with the American people not just about the situation in Iraq but about the true intentions behind the agenda your Administration is pursuing:
"You claimed that your tax cuts would create jobs. Instead we have three million fewer jobs in our economy than when you took office.
"You claimed that we would only run deficits that were small and temporary. Instead, we now face deficits in excess of billions the largest in history and red ink as far as the eye can see.
"You claimed that your tax cuts would strengthen and stimulate the economy. Instead, we have record numbers of personal bankruptcies, home foreclosures, and an unemployment rate that is the highest in 9 years.
"You claimed that the deficits were caused by the costs of 9/11, the war on terror, and homeland security. In fact, the cost of your tax cuts is three times the amount of those items,and your deficit forecasts do not even include the costs of the Iraq war.
"You claimed that your education program would live up to its name and that No Child would be Left Behind. Instead, school districts all across the country, including in your home state of Texas, are dumbing down their tests to ensure that their schools are not labeled as needing improvement. No Child Left Behind turns out to be a huge unfunded mandate on local governments that now must raise property taxes or find other sources of revenue to meet their legal obligations under the Act.
"You named your environmental initiatives Clear Skies and Healthy Forests, when the truth is that Clear Skies allows more pollutants into the air and Healthy Forests is little more than a bill to reward the logging industry.
"You claimed that national and community service was central to your vision for the country. Instead, you have sat idly by while membership in the program is threatened to be cut by 80 program.
"And you visited soldiers wounded in Afghanistan on January 17th and had the audacity to promise to provide the best care for anybody who's willing to put their life in harm's way when the previous day your Department of Veteran's Affairs cut off health care access to 164,000 veterans.
"Mr. President, it is time for the truth. It is time for the truth on Iraq but, more importantly, it is time to level with the American people on the true intentions of your administration. It is time to end the empty rhetoric and false promises. The issues at stake are too serious: the lives of our soldiers; the livelihood of our families; the health of our children; the future of our world.
"Let us instead work together to rebuild our national community-a community where we truly do not leave any child behind, where we preserve clean skies and healthy forests, and fulfill Harry Truman's dream of health care for all Americans. We must preserve the fiscal trust for our children and grandchildren and ensure that our seniors have access to the Social Security and Medicare that we promised them.
"Let's give people a reason to care about their government and to engage in politics again-to believe that their opinions matter and that their leaders listen. Let us work together to take our country back and to restore our lost idealism-to restore our moral force in the world community and to make this a democracy of the people, by the people, and for the people. We can do this, and we will-one voter, one supporter at a time. We will end the empty rhetoric and make the American people believe again.
The following information contrasts the administation's assertions with what the administration has actually done:

ECONOMY

ASSERTION: President Bush: "Government cannot manage or control the economy.(President Bush's budget message, 2/3/2003)

TRUTH: George W. Bush's administration cannot manage or control the economy.

ASSERTION: "This budget . . . is a plan to speed the return of strong economic growth [and] to generate jobs" (President Bush's budget message, 2/4/2002)

TRUTH: Since January 2001, over three million jobs have been lost. (WSJ, 7/24/03)

ASSERTION:". . . [O]ur budget will run a deficit that will be small and short term." (President Bush, State of the Union address,1/28/2003)

TRUTH: "... by 2013 the deficit will reach billion or 3.0 of Gross Domestic product, equivalent to ,300 for each household in America. In addition, such a policy of amassing ever greater debt over the next decade will cause the cost of annual interest payments on the debt to soar to billion a year by 2013. . ." (CBPP, Billion Deficits, As Far as the Eye Can See, 7/8/2003)

ASSERTION: "Tax relief is central to my plan to encourage growth. (President Bush, Western Michigan University remarks, 3/27/2001)

TRUTH: During the first quarter of this year, GDP rose at a sluggish rate of 1.4% (NYT, 6/27/03)

ASSERTION: "Now, you hear talk about deficits. And I'm concerned about deficits. I'm sure you are as well. But this nation has got a deficit because we have been through a war." (President Bush, Canton, Ohio, remarks, 4/24/2003)

TRUTH: The CBPP reports, "Congressional Budget Office data indicate that in 2003 and 2004, the cost of enacted tax cuts is almost three times as great as the cost of war, even when the cost of increases in homeland security expenditures, the rebuilding after September 11, and other costs of the war on terrorism including the action in Afghanistans are counted as war costs, along with the costs of the military operations and subsequent reconstruction in Iraq. (Richard Kogan, War, Tax Cuts, and the Deficit, CBPP, 8 July 2003)

ASSERTION: The minute I got sworn in, we were in a recession. And that's why I went to Congress for a tax package. (President Bush, Canton, Ohio, remarks, 4/24/2003)

TRUTH: Bush was inaugurated in January 2001; the recession began in March 2001. He did not inherit a recession. Moreover, the tax package he took to Congress was the same one on which he had campaigned. (National Bureau of Economic Research; Richard Kogan, War, Tax Cuts, and the Deficit, CBPP, 7/8/2003)

ASSERTION: "The growth and jobs plan I outlined earlier this year will provide critical momentum to our economic recovery. For every American paying income taxes, I propose speeding up the tax cuts already approved by the Congress." (President Bush's budget message, 2/3/2003)

TRUTH: Ten recipients of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Science said Bush's plan would not provide a short-term boost and would create long-term budget deficits. Franco Modigliani (MIT), who received the Nobel in 1985, called Bushs plan preposterous. Daniel McFadden, the 2000 recipient, described the plan as a weapon of mass destruction aimed at the middle class. (Blanton, The Boston Globe, 2/12/2003)

ASSERTION: My jobs and growth plan would reduce tax rates for everyone who pays income tax. (President Bush, Radio Address, 4/26/2003)

TRUTH: Analysis shows that 8.1 million lower and middle-income taxpayers, who pay billions of dollars a year in income taxes, will receive no tax reduction under the legislation. (Robert Greenstein, CBPP, 6/1/2003)

ASSERTION: "We have priorities at home as well restoring health to our economy above all. Our economy had begun to weaken over a year before September 11th, but the terrorist attack dealt it another severe blow. This budget advances a bipartisan economic recovery plan that provides much more than greater unemployment benefits: it is a plan to speed the return of strong economic growth, to generate jobs, and to give unemployed Americans the dignity and security of a paycheck instead of an unemployment check." (President Bush's budget message, 2/4/2002)

TRUTH: During the first quarter of this year, GDP rose at a sluggish rate of 1.4% and 1.2% of mortgages were in foreclosure, setting a record high. The unemployment rate climbed to a nine-year high of 6.4% in June. Setting a new record, 1.6 million Americans filed for personal bankruptcy last year. (NYT, 6/27/03; USA Today, 7/10/03; WSJ 7/24/03; U.S. News & World Report; 7/21/03)

ASSERTION: In his 2003 State of the Union, Bush said, "We will not deny, we will not ignore, we will not pass along our problems to other Congresses, to other presidents and other generations."

TRUTH: The White House released a deficit projection in July, 2003 of billion. (Source: White House Sees a 455 Billion Gap in the 03 Budget New York Times David E. Rosenbaum 7/16/03)

EDUCATION

ASSERTION: In January 2003, Bush defended No Child Left Behind: The main reservations we've heard in the year since we passed the reform have come from some adults, not the children, who say the testing requirement is an unfunded mandate on the states. Well, that's not true. We put up million to provide for testing. We demanded excellence. We're going to pay for the accountability systems to make sure that we do get excellence. (Official statements, Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents, 1/13/03)

TRUTH: The GAO released a report that the new testing will cost the states between $1.9 and .3 billion. (GAO Report, Characteristics of Tests Will Influence Expenses; Information Sharing May Help States Realize Efficiencies, May 2003) The FY 2004 Bush budget request was only million; Congress has already appropriated which still leaves a shortfall of million. (Congressional Press Release, 5/8/03)

ASSERTION: President Bush: You don't teach the test when it comes to literacy. We went to a Title 1 classroom -- or a classroom with Title 1 students in it, where the teacher was using some of the most advanced thought about teaching reading, a balanced approach including phonics. You teach a child to read and he or her (sic) will be able to pass a literacy test. I don't buy teaching the test as an excuse to have a system that doesn't hold people accountable for results. (Townsend Elementary School, Tennessee 2/21/2001)

TRUTH: In Texas, the board voted to reduce the number of questions that students must answer correctly to pass third grade reading exams from 24 out of 36 to 20. In Michigan, officials lowered the percentage of students who must pass statewide tests to certify a school as making adequate yearly progress to 42% from 75% of high school students on English tests. And Colorado overhauled the grading system used on its tests, lumping students previously characterized on the basis of test scores as partially proficient with those called proficient. (States are Relaxing Education Standards to Avoid Sanctions from Federal Law, Sam Dillon, New York Times, 5/22/03)

ASSERTION: In April 2002, Bush praised Lucy Salazar, a volunteer with the Even Start literacy program: One of the things I try to do when I go into communities is herald soldiers in the armies of compassion, those souls who have heard the call to love a neighbor like you'd like to be loved yourself, and have followed through on that call; Lucy Salazar is a retired federal government worker. She teaches reading skills to pre-kindergarten and kindergarten children -- incredibly important And oftentimes, citizens such as her never get the praise they deserve. Lucy, thank you for coming and representing thousands of people like you.

TRUTH: Bush has since proposed cutting the Even Start budget by 20% (Associated Press, 2/4/2002)

HOMELAND SECURITY

ASSERTION: One program, the Container Security Initiative, which would screen cargo at foreign ports, was specifically endorsed by Bush last June. "The Customs Service," he told an audience in Port Elizabeth, New Jersey, "is working with overseas ports and shippers to improve its knowledge of container shipments, assessing risk so that we have a better feel of who we ought to look at, what we ought to worry about."

TRUTH: Bush's budget provides no new funding for the program. (New Republic, March 2003)

HEALTH CARE

ASSERTION: In March 2001, Bush pledged to support children's hospitals: This is a hospital, but it's also - it's a place full of love. And I was most touched by meeting the parents and the kids and the nurses and the docs, all of whom are working hard to save lives. I want to thank the moms who are here. Thank you very much for you hospitality There's a lot of talk about budgets right now, and I'm here to talk about the budget. My job as the President is to submit a budget to the Congress and to set priorities, and one of the priorities that we've talked about is making sure the health care systems are funded.

TRUTH: Bush's first budget proposed cutting grants to children's hospitals like the one he visited by 15% ( million). His 2004 budget additionally proposes to cut 30% ( million) out of grants to children's hospitals. (Caught on Film: the Bush Credibility Gap, House Minority Appropriations Committee)

ENVIRONMENT

ASSERTION: On Earth Day, in April 2002, Bush said, Clear Skies legislation, when passed by Congress, will significantly reduce smog and mercury emissions, as well as stop acid rain. It will put more money directly into programs to reduce pollution, so as to meet firm national air-quality goals.

TRUTH: The Clear Skies plan would "generate millions more tons of smog-forming nitrogen oxides and allow three times more mercury emissions than current law." And according to EPA estimates, "the plan would have the effect of raising the amount of coal burned by power companies potentially generating 50 percent more sulfur emissions and delaying by up to 10 years major cuts in sulfur emissions required by the Clean Air Act." (League of Conservation Voters 2003 Presidential Report Card)

ASSERTION: Pres. Bush: "With the help of Congress, environmental groups and industry, we will require all power plants to meet clean air standards in order to reduce emissions of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, mercury and carbon monox- carbon dioxide, within a reasonable period of time." (September 29, 2000 file footage, ABC News)

TRUTH: Ted Koppel reported that the original pledge [to regulate carbon dioxide] was written off as sloppy work by a campaign speechwriter. The president was persuaded to drop a line restating the pledge from his speech to Congress. Two weeks later, it was officially dead."(Nightline, April 25, 2001)

ASSERTION: President Bush: "I have sent you a healthy forest initiative, to help prevent the catastrophic fires that devastate communities, kill wildlife, and burn away millions of acres of treasured forests. I urge you to pass these measures for the good of both our environment and our economy." (January 28, 2003, State of the Union Address)

TRUTH: "Bush's Healthy Forests initiative likewise suffers from Orwellian doublespeak, felling Western forests to save them. Disguised as a measure for curbing wildfires, the plan invites logging companies to cut healthy trees in national forests while reducing public oversight. Ironically, the probable cause of recent catastrophic fires is global warming, a problem that most Republicans deny." (By Glen Scherer for salon.com January 6, 2003)
AMERICORPS AND NATIONAL SERVICE

ASSERTION: In his 2003 State of the Union address, Bush promised to expand AmeriCorps: "Our country also needs citizens working to rebuild our communities. We need mentors to love children, especially children whose parents are in prison. And we need more talented teachers in troubled schools. USA Freedom Corps will expand and improve the good efforts of AmeriCorps and Senior Corps to recruit more than 200,000 new volunteers." (State of the Union Address, 1/28/2003)

TRUTH: The funding of AmeriCorps is currently in conference as part of the emergency supplemental bill. Although the Senate has moved to restore/increase funding, the House is resisting such attempts. As it now stands, membership in AmeriCorps would be slashed by 80%. Throughout the public debate on the subject, Bush has not taken any action to persuade the House to increase or restore the funding. (David Broder House Senate Feuds end up targeting innocent victims, Chicago Tribune- 7/22/03;AmeriCorps May Still Win Extra Funding; Associated Press,7/22/03)

ASSERTION: In January 2003, Bush praised the Boys and Girls Club: I want to thank the Boys & Girls Clubs across the country. The Boys & Girls Club have got a grand history of helping children understand the future is bright for them, as well as any other child in America. Boys & Girls Clubs have been safe havens. They're little beacons of light for children who might not see light. And I want to thank them for their service to the country. Part of the vision for America is that we have a mosaic of all kinds of people providing love and comfort for people who need help. (George W. Bush Delivers Remarks on First Anniversary of the USA Freedom Corps, FDCH Political Transcripts, 1/30/02)

TRUTH: In his 2002 budget, Bush proposed cutting all federal funding for the Boys and Girls Club.

ASSERTION: In January of 2002, Bush had praised Teach for America founder Wendy Kopp while visiting Booker T. Washington High School in Atlanta: Out of an idea came the desire to convince folks to teach in schools that are having trouble getting teachers. And she has succeeded way beyond what people thought a single person could do. (Professional Educators, Politicians and Students Show Support for Teach for America Program in Atlanta, Minority Professional Network, 1/31/02)

TRUTH: On July 11, 2003, Teach for America (TFA) was notified it would not receive any funding from the Corporation for National Community Service, the agency responsible for AmeriCorps funds. TFA expected million in grants and leaves TFA short 2,700 education awards for its teachers out of 3,300 corps members who will be teaching this year. (Teach for America Shut Out of Americorps National Funding Awards, TFA web site, 7/15/03)
VETERANS AFFAIRS

ASSERTION: On January 17, 2003, Bush visited 5 soldiers injured in Afghanistan at the Walter Reed Medical Center. He praised Army doctors and said, We should and must provide the best care for anybody who's willing to put their life in harm's way. (Bush Visits Soldiers Mending from Afghanistan Wounds, Associated Press, 1/17/03)

TRUTH: The previous day, Bush's Department of Veterans Affairs announced it was cutting off access to its health care system for 164,000 veterans who were expected to enroll in the current fiscal year. (VA Cuts Some Veterans Access to Health Care, Washington Post, 1/17/03)
HOUSING

ASSERTION: In June 2002, Bush visited an Atlanta housing project that used HUD's HOPE VI grants: "You know, today I went to the -- to some of the home --met some of the homeowners in this newly built homes and all you've got to do is shake their hand and listen to their stories and watch the pride that they exhibit when they show you the kitchen and the stairs...They showed me their home. They didn't show me somebody else's home, they showed me their home. And they are so proud to own their home and I want to thank them for their hospitality, because it helps the American people really understand what it means." (Remarks by President George Bush re: Expanding Opportunities for Homeownership," Federal News Service, 6/17/02)

TRUTH: The President's 2004 budget cut all HOPE VI funding.

AGRICULTURE

ASSERTION: In April 2002, at the South Dakota Ethanol Plant, Bush said, I said when I was running for President, I supported ethanol, and I meant it. I support it now, because not only do I know it's important for the ag sector of our economy, it's an important part of making sure we become less reliant on foreign sources of energy.

TRUTH: The plant had received ,000 in 2001 under Clinton's Bioenergy Program. Bush cut the plant's bioenergy program in his 2004 budget. (Department Biodiesel, Ethanol Program May Be Renewed, Associated Press, 4/22/02)
This origianal article is posted at http://blog.deanforamerica.com/archives/000779.html

Click here to post your comments and join the debate.

3303